AGENDA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
REGULAR
BOARD MEETING
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
Metro Headquarters
3rd
Floor - Board Room
One
Gateway Plaza
Los
Angeles
Thursday,
May 23, 2002 – 9:30 a.m.
Call
to order:
Directors:
John
Fasana, Chair
James
Hahn, 1st Vice Chair
Zev
Yaroslavsky, 2nd Vice Chair
Michael
Antonovich
Hal
Bernson
Yvonne
Brathwaite Burke
Paul
Hudson
Don
Knabe
Gloria
Molina
Pam
O’Connor
Beatrice
Proo
Frank
Roberts
Allison
Yoh
Robert
Sassaman, Ex Officio
Chief
Executive Officer – Roger Snoble
Board
Secretary - Michele Jackson
Ethics
Officer - Karen Gorman
Inspector
General - Arthur Sinai
General
Counsel - County Counsel
1.
APPROVE Consent Calendar Items: 2, 9**, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35
and 36
** - Requires 2/3 vote of the Board
NOTE COMMITTEE AUTHORITY ITEMS: 11, 12 and 14
CONSENT
CALENDAR:
2.
APPROVE Minutes of Regular
Board Meeting held April 25, 2002 and Special Board Meeting held on May 13,
2002.
9. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED (4-0):
A.
finding that procurement under Public Utilities Code §130232 does not
constitute a procurement method adequate to meet Metro’s needs and that the
procurement of the buses qualifies under Public Contracts Code (PCC) § 20217
for procurement by competitive negotiation;
B.
authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to solicit proposals for up to
seventy-two (72) CNG-electric
or CNG-hybrid 60-foot articulated transit buses as a competitive
negotiation pursuant to PCC § 20217 and Metro’s Procurement Policies and
Procedures for use on the San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit (BRT); and
C.
authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to solicit proposals for up to
200 advanced design, high performance 60-foot
articulated CNG transit buses as a competitive negotiation pursuant to PCC
§20217 and Metro’s Procurement Policies and Procedures for use on existing Metro
bus routes.
(Requires
two-thirds vote of the Board)
23.
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT & AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED (4-0), adopting
the following positions on state
legislation:
A.
AB 2098 (Bates) – a federal statute
requires states to adopt four penalties for repeat drunk driving violations.
California meets two of these four requirements and is subject to mandatory
transfer of federal transportation funds to certain safety programs: 1) AB 2098
would impose an ignition interlock requirement, and; 2) allow currently
transferred highway funds to flow through the STIP. SUPPORT, SEEK
AMENDMENTS.
B.
AB 2189 (Koretz) – would impose a
60-day employee retention requirement when a contractor for a public transit
service is terminated. OPPOSE
UNLESS AMENDED.
C.
AB 2333 (Nakano)
– would require Caltrans to give priority to projects that promote airport
development and access, only if the county is compatible with the aviation
element of the RTP under SCAG’s guidelines and authorize Southern California
Regional Aviation Authority to review county master plans for compliance with
RTP. OPPOSE
D.
SB 1918 (TORLAKSON) - sponsored by the
developers and manufacturers of the Segway Human Transporter vehicle.
The bill defines the Segway as an electric personal assistive mobility
device (EPAD), with amendments consistent with those requested by the League of
California Cities. SUPPORT, WITH
AMENDMENTS
29.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
(4-0) approval of the FY 2002-03 Southern
California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA)
Preliminary Budget; Metro’s
financial contributions to that Budget totaling $37,592,549; and an additional
$20,000 for promotional train programs not included in the SCRRA budget.
30.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
(3-0-1) award of three separate nine-month, firm fixed-price contracts to
perform preliminary engineering services through the preparation of Noise
Barrier Scope Summary Reports (NBSSR), Environmental Documents, and Noise Study
Reports for the Post 1989 Metro Retrofit Soundwalls,
Phase I, Priority 2 projects. Each of the following firms will independently
perform preliminary engineering services for discrete freeway corridors:
A.
Washington Infrastructure
Services, Inc. (Contract No. PS-4340-1237) for the amount of $1,850,000
for packages 1 and 3;
B.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (Contract No. PS-4340-1238) for the amount of $735,000
for project package 2; and
C.
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. (Contract
No. PS-4340-1239) for the amount of $485,000 for project
package 4.
31.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
(4-0) approval of seven new Subregional
Paratransit projects for implementation beginning in FY03 in the total
amount of $700,000.
32.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
(5-0) approval of the Regional
Improvement Program (RIP) changes for inclusion
in the Final 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for Los
Angeles County as follows:
A.
re-assign funding to four projects totaling $43.0 million from RIP funds
to Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, thereby permitting nineteen
(19) projects to be advanced;
B.
re-program $42.5 million in RIP funds freed up by Recommendation A and
$5.0 million in RIP reserves to the Interstate 5 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane
project between Routes 134 and 170 in FY 2007 and seek accelerated construction
phase funding for this project from the State through the 2003 Call for Projects
and 2004 STIP processes; and
C.
re-program $500,000 in RIP funds freed up by Recommend-ation A, to Route
101/Van Nuys Off-Ramp project, to meet one-half of the $1 million match that the
California Transportation Commission requires before granting $8 million of
Interregional TIP funds and secure the remaining $500,000 needed from the City
of Los Angeles by redirecting some of their existing Call for Projects funding
or providing some other non-Metro funding source.
33.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
(5-0):
A.
increasing funding limit for Rideshare
Program from $4,367,270 to $4,667,270 to close out the Memorandum of
Understanding with SCAG for FY 02; and
B.
transitioning to an Metro-operated Rideshare Program that integrates
rideshare offerings with transit pass programs that will create a complete line
of alternative transportation services for employers, schools and communities.
34. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDED (4-0) authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and
execute Amendment No.1 to Contract No. OP2610LASD with the County of Los Angeles
for Sheriff’s Department (LASD) transit
policing service for a period of five months beginning July 1, 2002, for
an amount not to exceed $8,750,000, for a total contract value not to exceed
$103,650,000.
35. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED (4-0) award of a
firm, fixed-price contracts under Bid 02-0219 to the lowest responsive,
responsible bidders for Heavy
Duty Tow Trucks and Field Equipment Trucks for a firm fixed price of
$2,538,529 inclusive of sales tax:
A.
Boerner Truck Center, for 14 Heavy Duty Tow Trucks for a total contract
value of $2,270,340 inclusive of sales tax, and;
B. West Covina Motors Inc., for 5 Field Equipment Trucks for a total contract value of $268,189 inclusive of sales tax.
36.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED (5-0) communicating the
following findings to Access Services, Inc. (ASI)
A.
that Metro endorses the inclusion of some “lifeline” service for
individuals requiring same day unscheduled trips in ASI’s planned mix of
services.
B.
that the funding for this “lifeline” service should be part of the
previously approved $58.6 million;
C.
that the Metro, in its role as regional planner and programmer, will work
with ASI staff to recommend financial and organizational modifications for
funding the “lifeline” service.
APPROVED
UNDER COMMITTEE AUTHORITY
- (Items 11, 12 and 14)
11.
APPROVED UNDER OPERATIONS COMMITTEE AUTHORITY (4-0) execution of an
agreement with the California Highway Patrol to provide field officer and
dispatch support to the
Metro Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) during FY03 for a total amount not to
exceed $405,000.
12.
APPROVED UNDER OPERATIONS COMMITTEE AUTHORITY (4-0) award of a firm,
fixed-price contract under Bid No. 01-0224 to the following lowest responsive
and responsible bidders for pick-up
trucks for the total amount of $410,965, inclusive of sales tax:
A. Burch Ford for line item #1 for 15 each compact pick-up trucks for the amount of $191,510 inclusive of sales tax; and
B.
Ford West for line item #2 for 10 each full-size pick-up trucks for the
amount of $219,455 inclusive of sales tax.
14.
APPROVED UNDER CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE AUTHORITY (5-0), AS CORRECTED:
A.
execution of Work Authorization Change Notice (WACN) No. 45.04 to
Contract No. P2000, Los Angeles Standard Light Rail Vehicle, with Siemens
Transportation Systems Inc., to
design, build and install between car barriers on
the 52 light rail vehicles currently on order under the contract, increasing the
amount of the WACN from $200,000 to $500,000, and increasing the total contract
value from $214,890,246 $214,552,446 to $215,190,246
$214,852,446; and
B. negotiation and execution of the subsequent contract change order, providing that the negotiated value is less than or equal to the current proposed value of
$1,165,893, which includes the above $500,000 increased WACN value.
NON-CONSENT:
3.
Chief Executive Officer’s Report
4. Chair’s Report
Presentation of Resolution to retiring Ex Officio Board Member, Robert Sassaman.
5. ADOPT the Joint Development Policies and Procedures to replace the Metro’s previously adopted joint development policy document.
16.
FINANCE AND BUDGET COMMITTEE FORWARDED TO THE FULL BOARD WITHOUT
RECOMMENDATION AS AMENDED BY BURKE adoption of:
A. the Fiscal
Year 2002-2003 Budget; and
B.
the Reimbursement Resolution to authorize the expenditure of funds for
capital construction and acquisition activities prior to issuance of debt for
specific activities.
BURKE
AMENDMENT:
that the Metro Board approve the Metro Budget with the condition that those items
containing money for the Pasadena Gold Line (PGL) are approved contingent upon
this Board’s further review and receiving a full report discussing the issues
and containing answers to the following questions:
A.
What are the “real” total costs to Metro for all aspects of Pasadena
Line opening on the proposed schedule?
B.
What are the terms contained
in the Master Cooperative Agreement as it pertains to Reimbursement for costs
expended by the Metro?
C.
Identify what costs are proposed to be the sole responsibility of the Metro
and why they are the Metro’s responsibility in the context of the “Turnkey” project’s definitions.
D.
What sources of funds are being proposed to be used?
What is being deferred or what other regional projects are not being
funded due to the use of these funds for the PGL project?
What were these funds programmed for before any such PGL proposal?
E.
If Bonds are sold (as indicated on pg 6-20 in Appendix 4) to provide
funds for this project, what revenue sources are being bonded against and what
are the primary uses for these revenues if not used for bonding on this project?
17.
FINANCE AND BUDGET COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL (4-0-1) OF REVISED
FASANA MOTION that Propositions
A & C revenues should be taken off the top for the administration of
Propositions A & C programs. Furthermore,
Propositions A & C and operational expenditures should be expended from
appropriate eligible Propositions A & C allocations.
A.
that funds taken off the top for the administration of Propositions A
& C programs should not be expended for regional programs that are
operations related;
B.
that funds taken off the top for the administration of Propositions A
& C programs should not be expended for Metro operations related activities;
C.
that the Board direct the CEO to report back to the Board within 30 days
on the impact of the implementation of these clarifications to the financial
standards and to recommend modifications to the FY03 budget as appropriate; and
D.
that the Board direct the CEO to provide a detailed listing in future
annual budgets and comprehensive annual financial reports of programs using
Propositions A & C administrative funds.
28. PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
(5-0) APPROVAL AS AMENDED BY MOLINA:
A. receiving Caltrans’ approved Project
Study Report/Project Development Support (PSR/PDS) for the State
Route 2 Freeway Terminus Improvements project; and
B. authorizing the Chief Executive Officer
to proceed with the next phase of project development, the preparation of the
Project Approval/Environmental Document, and include in the environmental
scoping process the four candidate alternatives identified in the PSR/PDS and
the alternative proposed by the Echo Park Community Action Committee.
MOLINA
AMENDMENT:
A.
that the environmental phase consist of a full environmental impact
report (EIR/EIS);
B.
that the environmental phase include an analysis of the community’s
alternative and that it be analyzed to the same level that the other four
alternatives were studied in the PSR;
C.
that the environmental document include a new and expanded traffic study
that sets the study area to be the I-5/SR-2 interchange at the north and the
Berkly/Alvarado/Glendale Blvd. intersection to the south.
The traffic study must include a validation of the existing capacity on
Glendale Blvd. without assuming any additional enhancements other than those
associated with the LA City project. Furthermore,
the study should be based upon the projected traffic volumes in 2025 given the
particular constraints in the corridor, rather than the projected demand; and
D.
that the environmental phase include additional pedestrian safety
enhancements and possible traffic calming techniques beyond those that are
currently included in the alternatives.
24.
CLOSED SESSION:
A. Conference with Legal Counsel –
Existing Litigation G.C. 54956.9(a):
1.
Alvarez v. Metro, Case No. PC026760
2.
Lee v. Metro, Case No. BC237857
3.
Burbank v. Metro, Case No. PC035498
4.
Tutor-Saliba-Perini v. Metro. No. BC123559
5.
Mangrove Estate v. Metro, BC271206
B. Public Employee Performance
Evaluation - G.C. 54957:
1.
Chief Executive Officer
2.
Chief Ethics Officer/Manager
Consideration of
items not on the posted agenda, including: items to be presented and (if
requested) referred to staff; items to be placed on the agenda for action at a
future meeting of the Board; and/or items requiring immediate action because of
an emergency situation or where the need to take immediate action came to the
attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of the agenda.
COMMENTS
FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST WITHIN BOARD’S SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
ADJOURNMENT
[Return to Meeting Schedule]