EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 19, 2002
SUBJECT: LOS
ANGELES COUNTY PROJECTS FOR THE REAUTHORIZATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY
ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21)
ACTION:
ADOPT TEA-21 REAUTHORIZATION PROJECTS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the
following:
A.
Revised list of Los Angeles County projects for Reauthorization of
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21).
B.
Revisions to The Los Angeles County Principles for
Reauthorization General Principles.
ISSUE
The
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) will expire
on September 30, 2003. This
legislation will need to be reauthorized to provide federal funding for
surface transportation programs and projects across the county.
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and
other transportation providers in the county have developed a project list and
revised set of principles to submit to the State of California and Los Angeles
County Congressional Delegation.
BACKGROUND
Since February 2002, the Metro has been developing a regional list of projects that could be supported for funding through the TEA-21 Reauthorization process. The Metro also has requested the Sub Regional Councils of Governments, cities, County of Los Angeles, Municipal Operators and local organizations to submit recommended projects for funding during this next Reauthorization period. Metro staff has included projects from the Metro Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County (“the Long Range Plan”) that could benefit from federal funding.
From
this list of projects, Metro staff is recommending that nine projects be given
the highest priority for funding in the TEA-21 Reauthorization.
These are major, regionally significant projects that have received
previous Board commitment. All of
the projects are included in the Long Range Plan --- either in the Baseline
(committed)
element or the Constrained (funded) element.
All of the projects except the Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA) project
have design or construction funding in from the State Transportation Congestion
Relief Program (TCRP) and/or State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
In addition, these same projects are programmed for funding (in full or
in part) in the first ten years of the Long Range Plan.
The LAWA project is included because of the recent federal Homeland
Security efforts.
With
respect to the remaining projects on the list, Metro staff is recommending that
the Metro Board acknowledge its support for these projects in the TEA-21
Reauthorization. Many of these
projects are specifically listed in the Long Range Plan in either the
Constrained (funded) element or the Strategic (unfunded) element indicating the
Metro’s previous recognition of the importance of these projects.
Other projects on the list could apply for funding in the Metro’s Call
for Projects process. Many of these
projects are priorities of individual cities, subregions, or the County of Los
Angeles.
Staff
will continue to work with the Los Angeles County Congressional delegation to
ensure all member-sponsored projects are listed in this document.
The
Metro, the City of Los Angeles, and County of Los Angeles staffs, are also working
to further develop the concept of a “Metropolitan Congestion Program” and
how it meets Los Angeles County needs. Staff
will continue to update the Board in subsequent meetings as the legislation
emerges and issues develop over the next year.
NEXT
STEPS
Upon approval by the Board, Metro staff will distribute the Metro Principals and list of projects to the Secretary of Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Maria Contreras-Sweet and to the Los Angeles County Congressional delegation for inclusion in TEA-03.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment
A:
TEA-21
Reauthorization Projects Listings
Attachment
B:
Metro’s Regional TEA-21
Reauthorization General Principles
Prepared
by:
Marisa Valdez Yeager
Government Relations Administrator
Frank Flores
Deputy Executive Officer
Programming and Policy Analysis
Gary Clark
Deputy Executive Officer
Government and Board Relations
|
|
|
Maria
A. Guerra Chief
of Staff |
|
|
_____________________________________
James L. de la Loza
Executive Officer
Countywide Planning and Development
_____________________________________
Roger Snoble
Chief Executive Officer