EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT COMMITTEE

JUNE 20, 2002

 

 

 

SUBJECT:     PROP A/C ADMINISTRATION FUNDS

 

ACTION:       APPROVE CLARIFICATIONS TO Metro FY03 FINANCIAL STANDARDS

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

Approve clarifications to Metro’s FY03 Financial Standards as noted in Attachment A.

 

ISSUE

 

The Board requested clarification as to the eligible uses of Prop A and C administration funds as described in the Metro FY03 Financial Standards, standard B9, which was approved in April 2002. 

 

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

 

The Financial Standards are divided into three sections:  General, Debt, and Business Planning Parameters.  The Business Planning Parameters provide management with a framework for developing the following year's budget and other longer range financial plans and establishing future business targets for management to achieve.  Clarification of standard B9 regarding the eligible uses of Prop A and C administration funds impacts funds available to all other funding categories of Props A and C since administration funds are taken “off the top.”

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT

 

Approval of this action will impact the adopted FY03 budget as follows:

 

A.                 The costs of labor negotiations, $661,000, and sector planning activities, $18,000, totaling $679,000 previously funded by Prop A administration will be transferred to the Enterprise Fund as part of bus and rail operating costs.  $679,000 of Prop C 40% funds will be transferred to cover these additional operating costs.  The bus portion of this amount is approximately $600,000 based on union FTEs.  Therefore, an additional “fair share” amount of approximately $254,000 will be programmed for the municipal operators.  Funds are available from the “designated, unreserved,” available cash that is not programmed for expenditure in FY03, Prop C 40% Special Revenue fund balance.

B.                 The costs of regional activities including customer relations, $9,654,000, and transit way maintenance, $412,000, previously funded by Prop A administration funds will be transferred to the Enterprise Fund as part of bus and rail operating costs.  $10,066,000 of Prop C 40% funds will be transferred to cover these additional operating costs.  The bus portion of the customer relations amount is approximately $8,000,000 based on boardings.  Therefore, an additional “fair share” amount of approximately $3,600,000 will be programmed for the municipal operators.  Funds are available from the designated, unreserved fund balance.

C.                 In total, $10,745,000 of Prop A administration funds are freed up by this action.  These funds will lapse in accordance with the Financial Standard if they are not expended or encumbered within one year.

D.                 The resulting FY03 bus cost per revenue service hour (c/rsh) is $99.14.  Restated on this current basis, the FY02 budgeted c/rsh is $99.21.

 

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

 

The county-wide 1-800-COMMUTE activity benefits all modes of transportation by providing bus and rail transit information to customers.

 

One alternative is to fund this activity off the top of Prop A 40% Discretionary that is allocated to bus operators through the formula allocation procedure (FAP).  Implementation of this funding plan would have the impact of all bus operators sharing the burden in accordance within their respective FAP shares.  This alternative is not recommended because the Muni operators will argue that they are also providing regional information to patrons but within their existing formula shares.  Therefore, this method would not be equitable to them.

 

Another alternative is to provide the funding for Metro’s customer service activities without the fair share to the Munis.  Or, investigate the proportion of this activity that pertains solely to Metro bus operations in order to quantify the portion that is regional versus Metro bus.  The regional amount would then not be subject to the fair share policy.  Based on similar arguments noted above, it is expected that the Munis would feel that this method would also not be equitable to them.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Under the clarifications, regional programs that are operations-related and Metro operations-related expenditures are included in Metro’s transit operating costs.  In order to keep the Enterprise Fund whole, additional transfers from Prop C 40% are required.  Under current Metro Board policy, this additional transfer for Metro bus operations requires a “fair share” amount for the municipal operators.  The current fair share is approximately 30%.

 

Administrative or overhead activities such as Consent Decree Oversight will continue to be eligible for Prop A and C administration funds.  The costs of operating the services implemented for Consent Decree remain in the Enterprise Fund.

 

NEXT STEPS

 

  1. Update the previously approved budget document to reflect the changes approved in this action.

  2. Initiate an effort to assess regional activities in order to recommend an equitable method of sharing those costs and related funding between the Metro and Munis.

 

Attachment A – Revised Financial Standard B9

Attachment B – Revised FY03 Uses of Prop A and C Administration Funds

 

Terry Matsumoto

Executive Officer, Finance and Treasurer

 

 

 

 

Roger Snoble

Chief Executive Officer